Year 2015 Vol. 23 No 6

SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS
EXPERIMENTAL SURGERY

A.V. BURAVSKY, E.V. BARANOV, S.I. TRETYAK, M.K. NEDZVED

EVALUATION OF EFFECT OF LOCAL LIGHT-EMITTING DIODE PHOTOTHERAPY ON EXPERIMENTAL WOUNDS

EE "Belarusian State Medical University",
The Republic of Belarus

Objectives. To evaluate the effects of local light-emitting diode phototherapy (LED) on experimental wounds.
Methods. The study was performed on 102 white inbred rats with experimental purulent (Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa) wounds (6 subgroups with 17 animals in each). The rats in both control subgroups were not treated. Systemic antibiotic therapy was applied in the first and second subgroups of the main group; in the subgroups three and four of the main group (without antibiotic therapy) the local LED phototherapy were used sequentially: at first the antimicrobial photodynamic therapy with "Ointment Photolon" photosensitizer and emission wavelength λ1=(0,4050,002) m was applied, then the photoregulation by λ2=(0,6300,03) m was used. Conclusion about the impact of the local LED phototherapy on experimental wounds healing was made by comparing the results of visual observation, computer planimetry, histological and microbiological investigations in groups.
Results. The local application of unpolarized LED light λ1=(0,4050,002) m and medicinal agent Ointment Photolon led to the most significant reduction of the total wound microorganisms number in a short term, and the completion of the first phase of wound healing process by the seventh day of experiment. Stimulation of wound reparative processes was caused by local use of polarized LED phototherapy λ2=(0,6300,03) m after the inflammatory phase; this results in the activation of growth and maturation of granulation tissue formation as well as intensification of the epithelialization occurred from the edges of the wound.
Conclusion. The use of the local LED phototherapy with the selected parameters, taking into account the phase of experimental wound healing process resulted in the term reduction of healing no less than 5 days in vivo. The obtained results are considered to use a guide intended to develop treatment methods for designing clinical practice.

Keywords: light-emitting diode radiation, phototherapy, photosensitizer, wound process, epithelialization, granulation tissue
p. 601-611 of the original issue
References
  1. Abaev IK. Ranevaia infektsiia v khirurgii [Wound infection in surgery]. Minsk, RB: Belarus'; 2003. 293 p.
  2. Pierpont YN, Uberti MG, Ko F, Robson MC, Smith CA, Wright TE, Payne WG. Individualized, targeted wound treatment based on the tissue bacterial level as a biological marker. Am J Surg. 2011 Aug;202(2):220-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.09.009.
  3. Ishchuk AV. Fotodinamicheskaia terapiia: istoriia razvitiia metoda i ego prakticheskoe primenenie v lechenii gnoinykh ran i troficheskikh iazv nizhnikh konechnostei [Photodynamic therapy: history of development of the method and its practical application in the treatment of purulent wounds and trophic ulcers of the lower extremities]. Med Zhurn. 2007;(4):120-25.
  4. Klebanov GI, Shuraeva NIu, Chichuk TV, Osipov AN, Rudenko TG, Shekhter AB, Vladimirov IuA. Sravnitel'noe issledovanie deistviia lazernogo i svetodiodnogo izlucheniia na zazhivlenie ran i funktsional'nuiu aktivnost' kletok ranevogo ekssudata [A comparative study of the laser and the LED light on wound healing and the functional activity of the cells of the wound exudate]. Biofizika. 2005;50(6):1137-44.
  5. Whinfield AL, Aitkenhead I.The light revival: does phototherapy promote wound healing? A review. Foot (Edinb). 2009 Jun;19(2):117-24. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2009.01.004.
  6. Dai T, Huang YY, Hamblin MR. Photodynamic therapy for localized infections state of the art.Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2009 SepDec; 6(3-4): 170-88. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2009.10.008
  7. Giniuk VA, Rychagov GP. Kompleksnyi podkhod k lecheniiu patsientov s ostrym paraproktitom s primeneniem fototerapii [An integrated approach to the treatment of patients with acute paraproctitis with phototherapy]. Novosti Khirurgii. 2011;19(6):70-75.
  8. Stranadko EF, Kuleshov IIu, Karakhanov GI. Fotodinamicheskoe vozdeistvie na patogennye mikroorganizmy. Sovremennoe sostoianie problemy antimikrobnoi fotodinamicheskoi terapii [The photodynamic effect on pathogens. The current state of the problem of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy]. Lazer Meditsina. 2010;(2):52-56.
  9. Soyer T, Ayva S, Aliefendioğlu D, Aktuna Z, Aslan MK, Senyücel MF, Cakmak M.Effect of phototherapy on growth factor levels in neonatal rat skin. J Pediatr Surg. 2011 Nov;46(11):2128-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.06.012.
  10. Yeh NG. Wu CH, Cheng TC. Lightemitting diodes their potential in biomedical applications Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2010; 14(8):2161-66. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2010.02.015.
  11. Shumilin AG./red. Kompleks fototerapevticheskii Kalendula [Complex phototherapy Calendula]. Katalog vysokotekhnologichnykh tovarov RB. Minsk, RB: GU BelISA. 2014;(7):232.
  12. Shliakhtin SV, Trukhacheva TV. Vozmozhnosti i perspektivy ispol'zovaniia proizvodnykh khlorofilla dlia sozdaniia effektivnykh i bezopasnykh fotosensibilizatorov dlia fotodinamicheskoi terapii [Opportunities and prospects of chlorophyll derivatives to create safe and effective photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy]. Vestn Farmatsii. 2010;(2):87-106.
  13. Mbene AB, Houreld NN, Abrahamse H. DNA damage after phototherapy in wounded fibroblast cells irradiated with 16 J/cm(2). J Photochem Photobiol B. 2009 Feb 9;94(2):131-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2008.11.002.
  14. Buravskii AV, Baranov EV, Tret'iak SI, Skorokhod GA, Slabko IN. Eksperimental'noe obosnovanie effektivnosti lokal'noi antimikrobnoi fotodinamicheskoi terapii (in vitro) [Experimental evaluation of the effectiveness of local antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (in vitro)]. Med Panorama. 2013;4(139):10-16.
  15. Buravskii AV, Baranov EV, Tret'iak SI, Kvacheva ZB, Vladimirskaia AM. Vliianie poliarizovannogo svetodiodnogo izlucheniia na mitoticheskuiu aktivnost' kul'tivirovannykh fibroblastov kozhi krysy [Effect of polarized LED light on mitotic activity of cultured skin fibroblasts of rat]. Med Panorama. 2014;4(148):24-28.
Address for correspondence:
220116, Republic of Belarus,
Minsk, pr. Dzerzhinskogo, d. 83,
UO "Belorusskiy gosudarstvennyiy
meditsinskiy universitet",
2-ya kafedra hirurgicheskih bolezney,
tel. mob. 375 29 622-57-81,
e-mail: buravskyav@mail.ru,
Buravsky Aleksandr Vladimirovich
Information about the authors:
Buravsky A.V. An assistant of the 2nd chair of surgical diseases of EE "Belarusian State Medical University".
Baranov E.V. PhD, an associate professor of the 2nd chair of surgical diseases of EE "Belarusian State Medical University".
Tretyak S.I. A Corresponding Member of the NAS of Belarus, Minsk, Belarus, MD, professor, a head of the 2nd chair of surgical diseases of EE "Belarusian State Medical University".
Nedzved M.K. MD, professor of the pathological anatomy chair of EE "Belarusian State Medical University"
Contacts | ©Vitebsk State Medical University, 2007-2023