Year 2013 Vol. 21 No 6




SBEE HPE Perm State Medical Academy named after academician E.A. Wagner 1,
FSBEE HPE Perm National Research Polytechnic University 2,
The Russian Federation

Objectives. To improve surgical treatment results of the abdominal diseases by means of the differentiated use of a single-row continuous suture and modern synthetic antibacterial-coated suture materials and specified terms of absorption.
Methods. Biomechanical model has been designed and the characteristic parameters of simple interrupted and continuous sutures of the anterior abdominal wall aponeurosis have been calculated. The suture parameters have been experimentally proved on the laboratory animals and in clinical practice. Depending on the conducted treatment the surgical patients were subdivided into two groups. In the main group the continuous sutures for forming interorgan anastomoses and sewing of the abdominal wall hermetically according to algorhythm of prevention of surgical site infection have been applied. In the comparison group the laparotomic wounds and interorgan anastomoses were sewed with traditional interrupted suture by non-absorbable suture materials.
Results. The biomechanical modeling of the anterior abdominal wall aponeurosis sutures taking into consideration experimentally gained parameters of elasticity of aponeurosis and surgical thread have permitted to calculated the optimal characteristics of a single-row continuous suture as well as make a differentiated choice of surgical suture material. In the experiment on animals more rapid healing of surgical wounds by soft-fibrous scar using the modern absorbable surgical threads compared with the traditional sewing by capron have been shown. The advanced conception of prophylaxis of surgical infection site has been clinically applied that has permitted to reduce the number of postoperative complications from 14,2% to 3,6%.
Conclusions. The conducted study has confirmed the efficacy of single-row continuous suture application with absorbable suture materials in the complex prophylaxis of surgical site infection.

Keywords: suture materials, surgical site infections, biomechanical modeling of abdominal wall closure techniques
p. 38 46 of the original issue
  1. Buianov VM, Egiev VN, Udotov OA. Khirurgicheskii shov [A surgical suture]. Moscow, RF: Dimitreid Grafik Grup, 2000. p. 93.
  2. Gostishchev VK, Evseev MA. Nit' plius igla. Shovnyi material v obshchekhirurgicheskoi praktike: rukovodstvo dlia vrachei [A thread plus the needle. Suture material in general surgical practice: a guide for physicians]. Moscow, RF: AMA-Press, 2012. 188 p.
  3. Sahoo S, Greeson CB, McCarron JA, Milks RA, Aurora A, Walker E, Iannotti JP, Derwin KA. Effect of pretension and suture needle type on mechanical properties of acellular human dermis patches for rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Oct;21(10):141321.
  4. Gostishchev VK, Dibirov MD, Khachatrian NN, Evseev MA, Omel'ianovskii VV. Novye vozmozhnosti profilaktiki posleoperatsionnykh oslozhnenii v abdominal'noi khirurgii [New features of the prevention of postoperative complications in abdominal surgery]. Khirurgiia. Zhurn im NI Pirogova. 2011;5(56):5660.
  5. Egiev VN. Onoriadnyi nepreryvnyi shov anastomozov v abdominal'noi khirurgii [A single-row continuous suture of anastomosis in abdominal surgery]. Moscow, RF: Medpraktika, 2002. 100 p.
  6. Israelsson LA, Wimo A. Cost minimisation analysis of change in closure technique of midline incisions. Eur J Surg. 2000 Aug;166(8):6426.
  7. Ceydeli A, Rucinski J, Wise L. Finding the best abdominal closure: an evidence-based review of the literature. Curr Surg. 2005 Mar-Apr;62(2):2205.
  8. Justinger C, Schilling MK. Closing the abdominal wall - challenges and possible solutions. Zentralbl Chir. 2011 Dec;136(6):5647.
  9. Ming X, Nichols M, Rothenburger S. In vivo antibacterial efficacy of MONOCRYL plus antibacterial suture (Poliglecaprone 25 with triclosan). Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2007 Apr;8(2):20914.
  10. Rodricks JV, Swenberg JA, Borzelleca JF, Maronpot RR, Shipp AM. Triclosan: a critical review of the experimental data and development of margins of safety for consumer products. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2010 May;40(5):42284.
  11. Leaper DJ. Surgical-site infection. Br J Surg. 2010 Nov;97(11):16012.
  12. Nilsson T. Mechanical properties of Prolene and Ethilon sutures after three weeks in vivo. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1982;16(1):115.
  13. Kuchumov AG, Samartsev VA, Chaikina ES, Gavrilov VA. Biomekhanika shovnykh materialov v abdominal'noi khirurgii [Biomechanics of suture materials in abdominal surgery]. Sovr Probl Nauki i Obrazovania. 2012;(2):431.
  14. Fedorov AE, Samartsev VA, Gavrilov VA, Vil'deman VE, Slovikov SV. Eksperimental'noe issledovanie mekhanicheskikh svoistv sovremennykh khirurgicheskikh shovnykh materialov [Experimental study of the mechanical properties of current surgical materials]. Ros Zhurn Biomekhanik. 2009;13(4):7884.
  15. Azizi E, Halenda GM, Roberts TJ. Mechanical properties of the gastrocnemius aponeurosis in wild turkeys. Integr Comp Biol. 2009 Jul;49(1):518.
Address for correspondence:
614107, Rossiiskaia Federatsiia, g. Perm', ul. Kim, d. 2, GBOU VPO Permskaia gosudarstvennaia meditsinskaia akademiia im. ak. E.A. Vagnera, kafedra obshchei khirurgii lechebnogo fakul'teta,
Samartsev Vladimir Arkad'evich
Information about the authors:
Samartsev V.A. MD, professor, a head of a chair of general surgery of medical faculty SEI HPE "Perm State Medical Academy named after academician E.A. Wagner". Gavrilov V.A. assistant of a chair of general surgery of medical faculty SEI HPE "Perm State Medical Academy named after academician E.A. Wagner". Kuchumov A.G. PhD, associate professor of theoretical mechanics SEI HPE "Perm National Research Polytechnic University."
Contacts | ©Vitebsk State Medical University, 2007-2023