Year 2010 Vol. 18 No 3




Objectives. To evaluate the effectiveness of the surgical treatment application in case of the displaced fractures of the acetabulum posterior column and posterior wall.
Methods. The experience of surgical treatment of 31 patients with fractures of the acetabulum posterior wall and column has been analyzed. The fractures with more than 23 mm displacement, the interposition of the fragments in the joint, not set fracture-dislocations in terms up to 34 weeks from the moment of trauma were the indications for the operation. Kocher-Langenbeck posterior access was applied in all cases. The fixation of fractures was done by means of the reconstructive plates.
Results. Clinical results of treatment have been evaluated in terms up to 7 years after the operation. Excellent results have been obtained in 48 %, good and satisfactory in 29%, unsatisfactory in 23% of patients. X-ray outcome has corresponded to the clinical result characteristics.
Conclusion. Precise anatomical reposition and stable fixation by means of plates permit to achieve optimal treatment results of the given injuries and to start rehabilitation actions in early terms.

Keywords: acetabulum fracture, operative treatment, reconstructive plate, X-ray evaluation
p. 75 83 of the original issue
  1. Bray, T. J. Osteotomy of the trochanter in open reduction and internal fixation of acetabular fractures / T. J. Bray, M. Esser, L. Fulkerson // J. Bone Joint Surg. [Am]. 1987. Vol. 69. P. 711-717.
  2. Letournel, E. Acetabulum Fractures: Classification and Management / E. Letournel // Clin. Orthop. 1980. Vol. 151. P. 81-106.
  3. Letournel, E. Fractures of the Acetabulum / E. Letournel, R. Judet; ed. R. A. Elson. New York: Springer, 1981. 428 p.
  4. Matta, J. M. Fractures of the acetabulum: accuracy of reduction and clinical results in patients managed operatively within three weeks after the injury / J. M. Matta // J. Bone Joint Surg. [Am]. 1996. Vol. 78. P. 1632-1645.
  5. Mears, D. C. Extensile Exposure of the Pelvis / D. C. Mears, H. E. Rubash // Contemp. Orthop. 1983. Vol. 6. P. 21-23.
  6. Rowe, C. R. Prognosis of Fractures of the Acetabulum / C. R. Rowe, J. D. Lowell // J. Bone Joint Surg. [Am]. 1961. Vol. 43. P. 30-92.
  7. Alonso, J. E. Extended iiofemoral versus triradiate approaches in management of associated acetabular fractures / J. E. Alonso, D. Ramon, E. Bradley // Clin. Orthop. 1994. Vol. 305. P. 81-87.
  8. A modified extensile exposure for the treatment of complex or malunited acetabular fractures / C. M. Reinert [et al.] // J. Bone Joint Surg. [Am]. 1988. Vol. 70. P. 329.
  9. Smith, R. W. Fractures of the Acetabulum / R. W. Smith, H. B. Ziran, J. S. Morgan. New York: Informa Healthcare, 2007. 340 p.
  10. Judet, R. Fractures of the acetabulum: classification and surgical approaches for open reduction / R. Judet, J. Judet, E. Letournel // J. Bone Joint Surg. [Am]. 1964. Vol. 46. P. 1615-1636.
  11. Rommens, P. M. The Kocher-Langenbeck approach for the treatment of acetabular fractures / P. M. Rommens // Eur. J. Trauma. 2004. Vol. 30. P. 265-273.
  12. Helfet, D. L. Management of complex acetabular fractures through single non-extensile exposures / D. L. Helfet, G. J. Schmeling // Clin. Orthop. 1994. Vol. 305. P. 58-68.
  13. Routt, Jr. M. L. C. Operative treatment of complex acetabular fractures: combined anterior and posterior exposures during the same procedure / Jr. M. L. C. Routt, M. F. Swiontkowski // J. Bone Joint Surg. [Am]. 1990. Vol. 72. P. 897.
  14. Tile, M. Fractures of the pelvis and acetabulum / M. Tile. 3-nd ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 2003. 822 p.
  15. Surgically treated acetabular fractures via a single posterior approach with a follow-up of 210 years / G. Petsatodis [et al.] // Aristotle University of Thessaloniki [Electronic resource]. 2006. Mode of access: =ArticleURL&_udi=B6T78-4MG6PFM4&_ user=10&_coverDate=03%2F31 %2F2007 &_alid= 693416689&_rdoc=2&_fmt =summary&_orig= search&_cdi=5052&_sort=d&_d ocanchor=&view =c&_ct=6&_acct=C000050221&_version =1&_url Version=0&_userid=10&md5=aa80db76db 6fec028dea 0c723018b8cd#cor1. Date of access:1 December 2006.
  16. , . . / . . // . . . 2007. . 88, 2. . 176-179.
  17. The effect of surgical approach on blood flow to the femoral head during resurfacing / A. Khan [et al.] // J. Bone Joint Surg. [Br]. 2007. Vol. 89, N 1. P. 21-25. Abstr.
  18. The anterolateral approach leads to less disruption of the femoral head-neck blood supply than the posterior approach during hip resurfacing / R. Steffen [et al.] // J. Bone Joint Surg. [Br]. 2007. Vol. 89. P. 1293-1298.
  19. Results of operative treatment of fractures of the posterior wall of the acetabulum / B. R. Moed [et al.] // J. Bone Joint Surg. [Am]. 2002. Vol. 84. P. 752-758.
  20. Reconstruction of comminuted posterior wall fractures using the buttress technique: a review of 32 fractures / A. E. Nabil [et al.] // Int. Orthop. 2007. Vol. 31, N 5. P. 671-675.
  21. Richter, H. The use of spring plates in the internal fixation of acetabular fractures / H. Richter, J. J. Hutson, G. Zych // J. Orthop. Trauma. 2004. Vol. 18, N 3. P. 179-181.
  22. Merle DAubign, R. M. Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis / R. M. Merle DAubign, M. Postel // J. Bone Joint Surg. [Am]. 1954. Vol. 36. P. 451-475.
Contacts | ©Vitebsk State Medical University, 2007-2023