Novosti
Khirurgii
This journal is
indexed in Scopus









Year 2019 Vol. 27 No 6

SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS
GENERAL & SPECIAL SURGE

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18484/2305-0047.2019.6.656   |  

I.R. TERLETSKYI 1, M.R. VERKHOLA 1, I.V. TYMCHUK 2, V.S. ZHYKOVSKIY 2, YU.H. OREL 2

VACUUM-ASSISTED THERAPY FOR PATIENTS WITH DIABETES MELLITUS AND CHRONIC FOOT ULCERS

Lviv Regional Clinical Hospital 1,
Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University 2, Lviv,
Ukraine

Objective. To determine the bacterial load of wounds at the application of vacuum-assisted therapy for patients with diabetes mellitus and chronic foot ulcers.
Methods. The object of the research was patients with diabetes mellitus with chronic superficial (skin, subcutaneous tissues) wounds of the foot with the signs of mild infection according to the classification for determination of presence and severity of infection of IWGDF/IDSA. Oncopathology, heavy concomitant pathology and lesions of the osteoarticular apparatus were the criteria of exception. Patients were treated as out-patients and did not get system antibiotic therapy. Therapy of wounds was conducted by negative pressure 125 mm Hg in the continuous mode. The first stage of work was conducted to find out the level of the bacterial load of wounds before and 3 days after the vacuum-assisted therapy (the group was of 10 patients). The second group (10 patients) was selected to determine the dynamics of changes of the wound bioburden level after every 24 hours of vacuum-assisted therapy, the observation was performed during 96 hours of the bandage exposure. The level of the bacterial load was controlled according to the changes of index of colony-forming units in the gram of tissue (CFU/g) of the wound biopsy material.
Results. The average bioburden level of wounds for the 1st group patients after the removal of bandage was 8.111.27 lg CFU/g, this exceeds the initial level by 31.9 % (<0.05). The investigation of the material from the wounds of the 2nd group patients established a considerable increase of the average bioburden level of wounds in 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours after the beginning of the therapy, 10.8 %, 16.4 %, 38.9 % and 58.6 % accordingly (<0.05).
Conclusions. In patients with diabetes mellitus and chronic wounds of the foot with signs of infection, vacuum-assisted therapy does not provide essential control of the bioburden level and should be used in combination with systemic antibiotic therapy.

Keywords: vacuum-assisted therapy, diabetes, wound, bacterial load, infection
p. 656-661 of the original issue
References
  1. Miller C. The history of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT): From Lip Service to the modern vacuum system. J Am Coll Clin Wound Spec. 2012 Sep;4(3):61-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jccw.2013.11.002
  2. Hatch DC, Sauciuc V, Wagler EC, Schenavar B, Armstrong D. Negative pressure wound therapy: past, present, and future. J Foot Ankle Surg (Asia-Pacific). 2016 Jul-Dec;3(2):80-87. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10040-1053
  3. Ubbink DT, Westerbos SJ, Nelson EA, Vermeulen H. A systematic review of topical negative pressure therapy for acute and chronic wounds. Br J Surg. 2008 Jun;95(6):685-92. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6238
  4. Gregor S, Maegele M, Sauerland S, Krahn JF, Peinemann F, Lange S. Negative pressure wound therapy: a vacuum of evidence? Arch Surg. 2008 Feb;143(2):189-96. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2007.54
  5. Suissa D, Danino A, Nikolis A. Negative-pressure therapy versus standard wound care: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Nov;128(5):498e-503e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31822b675c
  6. Kim YH, Hwang KT, Kim JT, Kim SW. What is the ideal interval between dressing changes during negative pressure wound therapy for open traumatic fractures? J Wound Care. 2015 Nov;24(11):536, 538-40, 542. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2015.24.11.536
  7. Lambert KV, Hayes P, McCarthy M. Vacuum assisted closure: A review of development and current applications. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005 Mar;29(3):219-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2004.12.017
  8. Morykwas MJ, Argenta LC, Shelton-Brown EI, McGuirt W. Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: animal studies and basic foundation. Ann Plast Surg. 1997 Jun;38(6):553-62. doi: 10.1097/00000637-199706000-00001
  9. Argenta LC, Morykwas MJ. Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: clinical experience. Ann Plast Surg. 1997 Jun;38(6):563-76; discussion 577.
  10. Glass GE, Murphy GRF, Nanchahal J. Does negative-pressure wound therapy influence subjacent bacterial growth? A systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017 Aug;70(8):1028-37. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2017.05.027
  11. Lipsky BA, Peters EJ, Berendt AR, Senneville E, Bakker K, Embil JM, Lavery LA, Urbančič-Rovan V, Jeffcoate WJ. Specific guidelines for the treatment of diabetic foot infections 2011. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2012 Feb;28(Suppl 1):234-35. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2251
  12. Lipsky BA, Aragón-Sánchez J, Diggle M, Embil J, Kono S, Lavery L, Senneville E, Urbančič-Rovan V, Van Asten S. IWGDF guidance on the diagnosis and management of foot infections in persons with diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2016 Jan;32(Suppl 1):45-74. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2699
  13. Gardner SE, Hillis SL, Frantz RA. Clinical signs of infection in diabetic foot ulcers with high microbial load. Biol Res Nurs. 2009 Oct;11(2):119-28. doi: 10.1177/1099800408326169
  14. Ferringer T, Miller F. Cutaneous manifestations of diabetes mellitus. Dermatol Clin. 2002 Jul;20(Is 3):483-92. doi: 10.1016/S0733-8635(02)00018-9
  15. Gardner SE, Haleem A, Jao Y-L, Hillis SL, Femino JE, Phisitkul P, Heilmann KP, Lehman SM, Franciscus CL. Cultures of diabetic foot ulcers without clinical signs of infection do not predict outcomes. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(10):2693-2701. doi: 10.2337/dc14-0051
  16. Yusuf E, Jordan X, Clauss M, Borens O, Mäder M, Trampuz A. High bacterial load in negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) foams used in the treatment of chronic wounds. Wound Repair Regen. 2013 Sep-Oct;21(5):677-81. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12088
  17. Yang C, Goss SG, Alcantara S, Schultz G, Lantis Ii JC. Effect of negative pressure wound therapy with instillation on bioburden in chronically infected wounds. Wounds. 2017 Aug;29(8):240-46.
  18. Patmo ASP, Krijnen P, Tuinebreijer WE, Breederveld RS. The effect of vacuum-assisted closure on the bacterial load and type of bacteria: a systematic review. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2014 May 1;3(5):383-89. doi: 10.1089/wound.2013.0510
Address for correspondence:
79010, Ukraine,
Lviv, Chernihivska Str., 7,
Lviv Regional Clinical Hospital,
Surgical Department 1.
Tel. mobile: +380 98 449-11-61,
e-mail: teriva86@gmail.com,
Ivan R. Terletskyi
Information about the authors:
Terletskyi Ivan R., Surgeon, the Surgical Department 1, Lviv Regional Clinical Hospital, Lviv, Ukraine.
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8751-0489
Verkhola Markiian R., Surgeon, the Surgical Department 1, Lviv Regional Clinical Hospital, Lviv, Ukraine.
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9762-4236
Tymchuk Iryna V., PhD, Assistant, Microbiology Department, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Lviv, Ukraine.
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9290-2954
Zhykovskiy Volodymyr S., PhD, Assistant, Department of Disaster Medicine and Military Medicine, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Lviv, Ukraine.
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0594-5316
Orel Yuriy H., MD, Professor, the Surgery Department 2, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Lviv, Ukraine.
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2283-7843
Contacts | ©Vitebsk State Medical University, 2007